Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Ineffectual Trolls

  • Feb. 28th, 2005 at 8:50 AM
Gneechtoon
So somebody registers w/ TalkAboutComics specifically for the purpose of posting a link in the SJ forum to another forum somewhere else ("It's Walky" I think, I didn't explore), where people seem to think the Tiffany/pants newsbox is horribly androgynous.

However, and yes, I'm going to be smug here, my forumites responded with a friendly and civil, "Well, maybe you should give the rest of the strip a shot and see what you think." (Well done, guys!) My own thought is that if you think that picture looks even vaguely masculine, you watch too much anime. So, no, I'm not too upset by that discussion.

Standard troll tactics, of course, are that if one criticism doesn't cause a snit, you switch to another one. So they switch from attacking the art to grousing about how many guest strips there are. Well, yes, there are, but it's a self-defeating criticism. The fact that so many cool people are eager to help out with the strip says to me that I must be doing something very right.

Net score: Suburban Jungle 2, troll 0. Poor old thing. :) Have a nice life.

(FWIW, I'm willing to entertain the notion that the person was not a troll but was actually just rather inept at starting a pleasant conversation ... but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...)

-The Gneech

Comments

[info]kevinjdog wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 02:01 pm (UTC)
My own thought is that if you think that picture looks even vaguely masculine, you watch too much anime

Ah, so anime is to blame for driving [info]cody_frost up the wall. ;)
[info]the_gneech wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 02:05 pm (UTC)
I suspect he'd agree with that sentiment!

-The Gneech
[info]redkam wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 02:36 pm (UTC)
They seem to come in cycles. I guess they were expecting to get a whole sleut of furry fans screaming bloody murder on that livejournal. I'm glad that your readers gave him/her just enough attention to defeat its purpose. The guy may have had good intentions (such as they were) but really his initial post and the follow up, I really doubt it.

Moving on. Moving on.

To be fair, it didn't seem like the owner of the livejournal really didn't have much to say about SJ other than the initial question and the random answers to posts. It was the readers who did most of the bashing. They have their opinion, they're entitled to it. There are many, many webcomics around. Something for everyone.

A little off topic. I find tigers and lions to be especially hard to make to look feminine. Not without making them look like house cats instead. You do a really good job with Tiffany and Leona. :)

[info]the_gneech wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 02:43 pm (UTC)
Well thanks! =) FWIW, you did a fine job on Tiff in my sketchbook yourself (which will be going up as a Saturday Grab Bag in the not-too-distant future).

-TG
[info]chipuni wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 02:37 pm (UTC)
Is the newsbox androgynous?
You won't please everyone.

As you pointed out years back, Tiffany doesn't look like the underfed waif kind of model, either. She has hips and thighs.

I think that Tiffy looks yummy just as she is.
[info]the_gneech wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 02:44 pm (UTC)
Re: Is the newsbox androgynous?
Hee! Thanks. :)

-TG
[info]lowen_kind wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 02:38 pm (UTC)
Yes, it's It's Walky's creator's LJ. I did explore.

I'm amused that David had never heard of SJ or Tiffany before that Newsbox. I mean how many times had it been on before? And it's not you are exactly hiding the strip.

There were some people in that LJ that tried to help you, but most were like the one in the TAC:SJ forum, deriding the strip without even giving it a chance.

Some random comments from the LJ:
"Almost definitely female. God help us all."
------
"Surburban jungle sucks, Sorry to say, but its the same as 90% of other furry webcomics.

theres NOTHING there....I swear, those things are one step up from being self insert fanfiction."
------
"Because the artist, unlike YOU, doesn't know how to draw very well.

Then again I've never seen you try to draw a perky tiger girl.

You have a mission, David. Do you accept it?"

That last one strikes a nerve, as I believe you are better than David. Well, at least, you have a different style.


Then there is one comment that really takes the cake: From [info]danihana: "That tigeress is me. ;)"

Excuse me! You are not Tiffany Tiger! And you were not the model for that shot or Tiffany!

At least, as far as I know, the Jungloids don't go around logging into other comics forums just to put the comic down. We're, hopefully, above that.

End rant mode.



[info]the_gneech wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 02:49 pm (UTC)
Well gee, you didn't have to copy it all into my LJ. ;P

I think "It's Walky" is a perfectly good comic, I'm certainly not going to get into a pissing contest about whose art is better. We're going for two very different effects, so it's hardly surprising that some people would prefer one to another.

-TG
[info]lowen_kind wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 03:12 pm (UTC)
I didn't copy all of it into my post, just some of the more interesting(?) comments. :=3P

And, as I said as a qualifier, you have a different style.
[info]goodluckfox wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 03:55 pm (UTC)
Man. I just lost a crapload of respect for David Willis. I thought better of him than that. I mean, I'm actually shocked at his attitude. It's one thing to engage in one-artist-to-another critquing of work... but to make ad-hominem attacks and to invite your fans to do the same because it's "fun" to "pick on the furry fans..."

I *loved* "It's Walky." I laughed, cried, followed it every bit as religiously as his other fans.

I'm sorry some people don't dig SJ, but everybody has different taste. I don't particularly care for "Clan of the Cats" or "Wandering Ones" but I would never in a zillion years rag on their artwork or the artist personally (whether I was personally doing it or encouraging my fans to do it in my LJ; I have some experience in being smeared in a supposed friend's LJ while they merely stood by).

I see David's point about not being familiar with the character; without my glasses on and squinting a bit, I saw the newsbox and thought "Tiffany is looking a little tougher than usual". But the manner in which he handled it is completely unexpected. As I said, I am shocked, and his stock just took a *major* hit in my book.

Loxley
[info]the_gneech wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 04:04 pm (UTC)
Maybe he was having a bad day, I dunno. But thanks for the support nonetheless! :)

-TG
[info]kelloggs2066 wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 06:50 pm (UTC)
Eh. Anyone can have a bad day and say something they might regret later.

I hope that's all it was.

Still, I can't help but think that I tried reading his comic years ago, and just couldn't get into it. I'm further disinclined to do so now.
[info]dewhitton wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 09:55 pm (UTC)
I find it odd that a Keenspot artist can make a comment like that about a Keenspot stip, without bothering to look at the strip in question.
[info]rhanlav wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 04:53 pm (UTC)
Oy. You know, some folks just need to get over themselves when it comes to liking or not liking stuff. You know, if you don't like something, and you're gunna post it to your LJ, the least you can do is not go all trollish and post it to said comic's forums. Thats just annoying.

Eh, I don't get it. I personally liked the newsbox. But eh, what do I know? I'm just a webcomic junky who has like 65+ webcomics to read a day. -.-;
[info]the_gneech wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 05:55 pm (UTC)
Zowie! That's ... a lot!

-TG
[info]rhanlav wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 06:40 pm (UTC)
Luckily, some of them are M-W-F comics (like SJ). And some of them are sadly, ended (like Kid Radd and NeverNever).

So how many comics I actually read is.. uh.. probably around 40 or so, if I was to take a daily average. Maybe. Its hard to say. But yeah, I still hold true to my words. I'm a silly webcomic junky and my opinions on such are probably slanted.

But even I have some comics I don't read. Some of them I just dislike. Its rare, but I've run into some pretty bad comics out there. And then there's comics like Jack, where I can appreciate the comic from a certain standpoint, but I just don't like to read it because it makes me a VERY sad ferret. Trust me, I tried. I read the first 4 chapters and actually had to stop less I get myself really depressed. Actually, I was really depressed reading the first 4, but I meant even moreso. But if storytelling is about getting your audience to feel emotions, then the comic works very well in that respect.

But I'm rambling. And don't think I don't like Jack. Its just... not the happy Ferret Webcomic I like to read.
[info]the_gneech wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 06:42 pm (UTC)
No, believe me, I understand. There are plenty of comics that are perfectly well done, but that I don't read because I don't like the emotional effect they have on me. (There are songs, movies, and so on the same way.)

-TG
[info]rhanlav wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 07:57 pm (UTC)
Oh, cool. I'm glad that actually came out making sense. ^_^

And thats why I don't watch Red Dawn. Uh, that ending always kills me. ;_;

--Salen
[info]vverevvolf wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 05:09 pm (UTC)
but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...
Then it tastes like chicken!

/.-, VVolf
[info]the_gneech wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 05:55 pm (UTC)
I'm not tasting a troll to find out!

-The Gneech
[info]reynai wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 06:33 pm (UTC)
Very wise! Last time I bit one, it took forever to get the sewer taste out of my mouth.
[info]kamau_d_lyon wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 06:59 pm (UTC)
That was going to be my line as well. However I do agree with reynai, it's not worth the fowl taste in your mouth.
*grin*
[info]revar wrote:
Feb. 28th, 2005 08:24 pm (UTC)
Okay, I know I'll get flamed for this, so let me preface by saying that I _like_ SJ, and think the newsbox pic is pretty rocking.

But, the first time I saw that image, before I read about this thread, or about the flames elsewhere...
My first impression, with the text overlaying the image, was "Whoah! That's a different look for Conrad."
Followed by, when the text cleared, "Ohhh, it's Tiffany! Hee. Very agressive pose. Neat pic."

I guess I read too many webcomics. Bishonen Tiff. Hee.
[info]the_gneech wrote:
Mar. 1st, 2005 12:44 am (UTC)
Heh. Well, I certainly won't flame you for it. I don't see it, myself, but I won't flame you for it! ;)

-TG
[info]rhanlav wrote:
Mar. 1st, 2005 12:51 am (UTC)
Its probably just the arm position. Those familiar with Tiffany wouldn't make the mistake but the casual person not paying attention might. Eh, either way, no need to beat yourself over it, or let a troll do it to you either. ^_^