Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry


Just saw it. Loved it. Loved it. LOVED IT. LOVED IT! Absolutely five stars without reservation. They could not have made a better Speed Racer movie, or at least if it could be done, I don't know how.

And don't let the reviews fool you — this is a gutsy movie.

"Gneech," you may be saying to yourself, "what the heck do you mean 'gutsy'? Every review I've read talks about the simplistic plot and almost retro sense of do-gooderism."

That's it exactly! It's gutsy because, knowing full well they'd be sneered and spat at by the too-hip-for-the-room types — including many of their own fans — the Wachowski bros. stuck to Speed Racer. They didn't try to "make it cool," they didn't try to "reinvent it for modern audiences," heck, they didn't even get rid of the kitschy names like "Snake Oiler" and "Inspector Detector." Not only did they leave it there, they reveled in it. They made a Speed Racer movie that really looked, felt, and sounded like Speed Racer.

The wild, over-the-top effects and psychedelic colors are absolutely part of that. To see what I mean, first watch the original Speed Racer opening credits. In particular, watch the backgrounds, the distinctive art style, etc. Then watch the movie music video and compare. Yes, it's a little more frenetic and go-all-over-the-placey — but not that much. Not really. Speed Racer the movie, is a movie of what the world would be like, if Speed Racer wasn't a cartoon, you see what I mean? It's a brilliant tour-de-force.

What drives me most nuts about the negative reviews is that they keep sneering at Speed Racer for not being all these things they think it should be, as if they're deliberately ignoring both what it is, and what it's intended to be. The Speed Racer TV show was a boy's adventure tale, aimed straight at the 8-year-old heart and mind, with a few winks for any grownups (or older siblings) who might happen to be watching. That doesn't mean it's dumb, and frankly it's insulting to say so. It does mean that a direct, straight-faced approach to both narrative and characterization is what's called for, and it colors what themes your work needs to deal with.

"What's important in life?"

"How do I succeed? How do I prevail in a competitive world?"

"How do I relate to my family?"

"How do I know right from wrong?"

"How do I act on that knowledge when doing the right thing is hard or scary?"

These are important things for boys to learn, and these are the things that Speed Racer has always been about — the fast cars and explosions is just a framework, something to get the kid's blood pumping and past the "blah blah blah" reflex. (As an aside, the "blah blah blah" scene and Speed's trip into fantasy land is absolutely brilliant and absolutely spot on. I myself have woken up to a classroom staring at me because I was making my own sound effects while I drew. It happens!)

I don't know what exactly the other reviewers were wanting from it, other than a handy scratching post. The general attitude seems to be, "It could have been a good movie if it wasn't Speed Racer." Well, to them I cordially say, "Bite me, it's fun." If you're given something with as strong an identity as Speed Racer, dammit, you GO with it! (So to speak.) You put in corny gangsters, and Spridle and Chim-Chim doing candy raids and stowing away in the trunk, and Racer X being badass and smirking the whole time. Because to do anything else would be to get it totally wrong.

I'm so very, very glad to say, the Wachowskis got it totally right.

Thanks, guys. :) I've been waiting 35 years for this movie, and you didn't disappoint me. :)

-The Gneech

PS: Spridle and Chim-Chim are totally likeable. That is an impressive feat.


May. 13th, 2008 04:25 am (UTC)
I've seen maybe a half episode of the show. Do you think I'd still like the movie?

...do you think I'd get motion sick? It happened at the Bourne movie.
May. 13th, 2008 11:06 am (UTC)
I don't think you need to be a fan of the show to enjoy the movie, although it certainly helps 'cause you get all the easter eggs. :)

My suggestion is, start with the first seven minutes of the movie:


If you enjoy that, keep watching the rest of the clips there. They put a lot of focus on the slam-bang action, but that's not all there is to the movie. But if you enjoy those, you'll enjoy the flick. :)

As for motion-sickness, I can't say. I didn't get any, nor did laurie_robey, but I've heard reports of it. There's not that much perspective work, but there are a lot of shots with weird angles and stuff-flying-everywhere. I think the scene most likely to cause motion sickness comes at the very end:


* Look out! *

At the end of the last race, Speed basically drives through an explosion, doing a jump that turns into a victory roll, which causes the red-and-white checkers on the finish lane to swirl into a vortexey tunnel, which is a very, um, striking effect at full projection size. The same vortex tunnel appears at the beginning of the music video, if you want to see what it's like.

-The Gneech
May. 13th, 2008 11:47 am (UTC)
I'd only seen a few clips of the show, and I thought the movie was awesome. Motion sickness would definitely be possible, particularly if you go see it at an IMAX theater, IMO.
May. 13th, 2008 02:25 pm (UTC)
I didn't get motion sick, but the action on screen in certain places did give me vertigo. It was that feeling you get watching a film of being on a roller coaster. So I found myself almost falling out of the seat a couple times from reacting.

May. 13th, 2008 02:27 pm (UTC)
On a totally unrelated note, I love that icon. :D

May. 13th, 2008 03:03 pm (UTC)
Thank you. It's not quite perfect yet. The eyes don't roll quite as I want them to.

Latest Month

November 2019


Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow