One thing that needs to be examined re: mystery/horror gaming, is the relative fragility of player characters. When Cthulhu d20 came out, it was widely praised except for one item that got smacked up one side and down the other, which was that hit points still went up with level, theoretically enabling a 10th level character to get a shotgun blast to the face and still be in the fight. (This is not necessarily the case, BTW. The massive damage threshold in CoC d20 is a low, low 10 points. A shotgun to the face, doing an average of 12 points of damage, would trigger a Fort save vs. DC 15 to avoid dying instantly, no matter what your level or how high your HP. But I digress.) The general perception is that in order to keep suspense, the characters should be both fragile and expendable.
I've never actually played Call of Cthulhu, but I've read accounts of games where there was almost a revolving door of characters coming in one session, getting devoured or going nuts the next session, and a replacement character coming in the third. I've always found this baffling — how can you get any emotional investment in a character who's only going to be around for six hours or less of gameplay? And how can you come up with concept after concept when they get knocked down like so many bowling pins, short of resorting to "This is Agatha Lovejoy's twin brother Arnold Lovejoy..." followed by "This is Agatha and Arnold's cousin, Rupert Lovejoy..."
On the other hand, if the characters aren't threatened by combat, the natural instinct of most gamers will be to shoot first and ask questions later (if at all). Nothing takes care of gibbering cultists quite so efficiently as a Thompson equipped with a 50-round drum — at which point you're playing Doom or something instead.
So, it's a paradox which is going to require some thought. I'm curious, any of you out there in LJ-land who have played CoC (in any incarnation), how deadly was it? And how did it impact your experience? I'm very interested to hear about it.
-The Gneech
I've never actually played Call of Cthulhu, but I've read accounts of games where there was almost a revolving door of characters coming in one session, getting devoured or going nuts the next session, and a replacement character coming in the third. I've always found this baffling — how can you get any emotional investment in a character who's only going to be around for six hours or less of gameplay? And how can you come up with concept after concept when they get knocked down like so many bowling pins, short of resorting to "This is Agatha Lovejoy's twin brother Arnold Lovejoy..." followed by "This is Agatha and Arnold's cousin, Rupert Lovejoy..."
On the other hand, if the characters aren't threatened by combat, the natural instinct of most gamers will be to shoot first and ask questions later (if at all). Nothing takes care of gibbering cultists quite so efficiently as a Thompson equipped with a 50-round drum — at which point you're playing Doom or something instead.
So, it's a paradox which is going to require some thought. I'm curious, any of you out there in LJ-land who have played CoC (in any incarnation), how deadly was it? And how did it impact your experience? I'm very interested to hear about it.
-The Gneech
- Current Mood:
curious - Current Music:The Graveyard Shift
Profile
the_gneech- John "The Gneech" Robey
- gneech.com -- John "The Gneech" Robey's writing, comics, and art.
Comments
-TG
As for who would play such a game, and how? Um, you did. The pulp horror game I ran back in college? That was essentially Call of Cthulhu with the HERO System rules. It's all in how you play it. :)
-TG
-TG
CoC characters have some degree of sturdiness...you can do things like get shot a couple times and live to tell about it...it's just not a game that lends itself, unmodified to picking up and axe, grunting "it's you and me, ugly!" and hoping it'll come out alright in the end.
The idea is you do develop an attachment to the character, and so you fear for his life a little...so you end up playing him like someone who fears for its own. That's CoC of it. It's not just a horror game. It's a fear game.
I think the fragility of the characters forced the party to be innovative about how we aproached danger (which is something the system aims for). We couldn't just grab a bunch of guns and going blazing in, we had to find ways around some of the major dangers or to very quickly think and react to the dangers we were facing.
The slow decent of sanity is genius if role played well. All of the party members slowly got more and more twitchy and we descended deeper in the storyline. It was a real loss to me when my character had to be institutionalized...
Then again, that may have been one GM's peculiarity. *shrug*
I've got the way to bring you to life! o/`
--Salen
The problem is that there is a conflict between *authenticity* and good roleplaying mechanics. The soundest strategy in the few of this style horror game that i've played is often a honkload of running away. Trouble is, roll lousy, and it's goodbye you.
As other folks have noted, CoC isn't about the combat nearly as much as it is about the roleplaying, planning, strategy, and often running like crazy and whimpering for your mother.
It doesn't matter how many hit points you have, or what amazing powers and abilities you may possess: if you're up against someone or something who can remove the heart from someone's chest without leaving a mark, and abduct a party member without being seen even by the abductee, bladder control issues WILL arise.