Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

My tweets

  • Sat, 12:01: RT @pixelkitties: Well, that was quite an episode. I'm sure my companion here will be shipping this like Amazon Prime. https://t.co/nuOQt7
  • Sat, 12:01: Can we just appreciate for a minute that Trixie expected to die, there? And that this is a kid’s show? #MLPSeason6
  • Sat, 12:05: RT @MLP_Trixie: Spoilers: Trixie steals twilights princessness becomes god ruler of the universe
  • Sat, 12:09: I like that Trixie’s reformed, but still kind of a problem pony. She didn’t just have the switch in her back set to “good.” #MLPSeason6
  • Sat, 14:14: RT @applejinx: @the_gneech Two ponies went to very dark places over sophisticated intentions-vs-actions angst. Amazingly good writing for t…
  • Sat, 14:14: RT @applejinx: @the_gneech Meaning: of COURSE both Starlight and Trixie are tsundere and emotionally fragile, they have reason to be. And,…
  • Sat, 14:26: RT @NPR: It is unclear whether the animals are trying to stop humanity from unlocking the secrets of the universe.
  • Sat, 14:26: RT @carlreiner: Am off to screen DEAD MEN DONT WEAR PLAID @ Egyptian Theater, Q&A & a book signing of WHY & WHEN HE DICK VAN DYKE SHOW WAS…
  • Sat, 14:32: RT @Nya_mooon: 「おぉ、あなたは」 https://t.co/VKkjmh7zir
  • Sat, 17:33: Hmm. So, besides Gadgeteer, what are possible non-magical careers for an Int-based class in a d20 Modern/monster hunting context?
  • Sun, 10:40: Sherlock Holmes, who I’ll come back to; Spock, who is full of psychic powers besides just being a know-it-all...
  • Sun, 10:42: Nicola Tesla (gadgeteer), Dexter (gadgeteer), The Brain (gadgeteer)...
  • Sun, 10:43: Anyone who’s not a full-fledged wizard (a la Twilight Sparkle/Merlin) is basically a techno-wizard (gadgeteer) with only a few exceptions.
  • Sun, 10:44: That leaves us with the Sherlock Holmes types, whose ability boils down to being “super good at figuring out puzzles."
  • Sun, 10:44: See also Velma Dinkley, and arguably The Doctor, although he dabbles in gadgeteering too.
  • Sun, 10:45: “Phenomenal cosmic power! But still doesn’t get invited to parties." https://t.co/vioEn53n1s
  • Sun, 10:46: Anyway! Being “super good at figuring out puzzles” is difficult to translate to a game mechanic. Like being charming and witty.
  • Sun, 10:47: It’s one of those things where the player has to be able to at least fake it themselves, or the character doesn’t really work.
  • Sun, 10:47: Heh! That’s an interesting notion. :) https://t.co/CVF86T9BI4
  • Sun, 10:49: Yeah, the core class already has a “Plan” ability that basically acts like a bard’s inspiration bonus. https://t.co/jsv0xapRBC
  • Sun, 10:50: RT @UsefulAmy: Dear @neilhimself , Thanks for allowing #Stardust the movie to happen, because it may not be perfect but it makes me so happ…
  • Sun, 10:51: So far the class has the ability to create plans (giving the team bardic inspiration-style bonuses)...
  • Sun, 10:52: A bunch of saving throw and emergency mobility bonuses to make them more durable (because they’re squishy in terms of hit points)...
  • Sun, 10:54: Then there’s specializations, which is what I’m working on now. One tree is gadgeteering, that’s covered already.
  • Sun, 10:54: The next tree is “anatomist” which gives healing abilities and damage bonuses kinda like a cleric or paladin.
  • Sun, 10:55: I’d like to do one more specialization tree based on the “know everything and figure out puzzles” archetype, but that’s the tricky bit.
  • Sun, 10:57: I mean, the whole GUMSHOE RPG is built around the problem of “how do you make figuring out clues interesting” and it’s still tricky!
  • Sun, 10:58: “Jinkeys: Once per long rest, when the GM calls for an Investigation check, you automatically succeed.” Yay?
  • Sun, 11:03: That’s kind of my touchstone for this archetype: “Create the Velma class, and make it fun to play."
  • Sun, 11:04: What does Velma do? She finds clues, she figures out what they mean, she says “Jinkeys!”, she comes up with plans to catch the badguy.
  • Sun, 11:05: All of which is kinda baked into the core class to begin with, ‘cause every other brainy archetype does the same stuff, plus make gadgets.
  • Sun, 11:05: Velma needs to be double-dog-good at the stuff that everyone in the class already does.
  • Sun, 11:08: Puts a lot on the GM to determine what is a “flash of insight” and not a dead giveaway. See DnD’s “augury” spell. https://t.co/6P9mtYMyQq
  • Sun, 11:09: For context, I’m working on my 5E Ghostbusters conversion, so I’m also trying to work out abilities that fit the 5E philosophy.
  • Sun, 11:11: 5E favors simple but concrete mechanics that have high impact. Nebulous things like “give a clue” are not its thing.
  • Sun, 11:11: 5E pretty much assumes that all that stuff is happening on the player level.
  • Sun, 11:12: Yup, and tough to quantify! Hence the challenge of designing the class. :) https://t.co/xQBaAYmhGy
  • Sun, 11:12: Also one of the reasons Monte Cook’s Cthulhu d20 conversion fell flat, IMO. But that’s a rabbithole for another discussion.
  • Sun, 11:13: RT @tigerknight: New art: Lunden https://t.co/P72Mjdd6CJ https://t.co/A3q3USSTi9
  • Sun, 11:15: I’ve been looking at lot at CoC for my queues here, actually. Because for 30+ years it’s been the go-to game for “figuring clues” action.
  • Sun, 11:15: But CoC, at least as classically done, kinda ducks the whole issue by having a minimalistic percentile skill system and the “idea roll."
  • Sun, 11:16: (CoC then has some of the most painful combat rules in the world for when the action sequences start, go fig. It’s a weird game.)
  • Sun, 11:18: In short: CoC says “Uhhh… GMs and players work it out.” Leaving one to wonder why they bought the book. XD
  • Sun, 11:41: Basically, it boils down to, “How do I make being super-good at finding clues have the same impact as being able to build explodey gadgets?"
  • Sun, 11:42: ‘cos unless you have the most hardcore “investigation and RP uber alles” players in the world, damage dice will always trump.


Latest Month

March 2019


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow